|
The
Filipino State
(Another way of looking at
Philippine history)
By Guillermo Gómez Rivera
Webmaster's
Note: Guillermo Gomez Rivera is a Premio Zobel awardee, a member of the Academia
Filipina and former National Language Committee
Secretary, Philippine Constitutional Convention 1971-73.
Part
1: What is a ‘state’?
Part 2: When was the origin, or birth of the Filipino state?
Part 3: What was the status of the Filipino state in 1571?
Part 4: The integration of the pre-Hispanic ethnic states
Part 5: Maturity of the Filipino state in 1898
Part 6: 1900: The Filipino people was deprived of its own
state
Part 7: Was the Filipino state mortgaged and hocked? Was it
grossly betrayed? Will the Filipinos remain to be stateless
even in their own country?
1.
What is a ‘state’?
A
small dictionary defines state as "a territory with
laws".
The
word "laws" in this definition naturally implies
that there are people living in that "territory".
This also means that the "territory" is the
patrimony of the people living in it for which they have laws.
And
the very fact that a territory has its own laws, it also
implies that it has a basic attribute of sovereignty to make
such laws for itself.
Thus,
the word "laws" in this definition also implies that
there is a government, with defending soldiers or policemen,
existing in the same and referred to territory that enforces
those laws upon the people living in it.
That
government may be monarchial because the ruler is a Chieftain
or a King or by whatever title such a ruler may be called.
Let
us now find out the origin and evolution of the State that
locals, as well as foreigners, now call as the Filipino State.
Ang Estado ng Filipinas.
2.
When was the origin, or birth, of the Filipino State?
When
Philippine history is taught now-a-days, the origin, or birth,
of the Filipino State is not discussed. It is deliberately
omitted.
By
whom? - You would ask. And we would answer pointblank:
----- by our White Anglo Saxon Protestant
(WASP) masters who by their undue interference in the
language and economic policies of the Filipino State threaten,
or violate, its attribute of sovereignty.
Why?
- You would again ask. In
order to turn Filipinos into strangers in their own country
for the purpose of better exploiting them economically in the
midst of their confusion about themselves.
And
this charge can be proved true by the un-Filipino results of
the educational system principally conducted in English which
most often makes relative, or insecure, the attribute of
sovereignty of the Filipino State.
But
let us go back to the main question. When was the birth of the
Filipino State?
The
answer is very easy.
At
the same instant that Manila was founded and established as
its capital city. And the date given to that event is June 24,
1571.
It
is, therefore, a fact that the Filipino State was
simultaneously founded with the founding of Manila.
For, why should there be a capital city, seat of a
Central Government and Law, without a corresponding State to
govern?
And
due to this fact, we come across a grave error being committed
in the manner Philippine history is taught in our schools.
We
often tell our students and children that Manila was founded
on June 24, 1571 as the Capital City of the Philippines but we
always fail to teach that with its founding the Filipino State
was also founded and established.
We
also fail to underscore that from that day onward, the
Filipino State began to exist as a jurisdictional reality up
to the present time as we find ourselves talking about it in
this year 2000.
continue
>>
RELATED:
>
The
evolution of the native Tagalog alphabet
> The
evolution of the native Tagalog alphabet: Genocide
> The
importantce of the Tagalog 32-letter alphabet to the modern
education of the Filipino youth
17 September
2001
|